Hello & Welcome to our community. Is this your first visit? Register
Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 140
  1. #111
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,258

    Re: Don Mattingly's disgrace

    If you are looking for Shaimonyou to respond it isn't going to happen.
    It says "banned" under his name. The last post I saw from him before it disappeared was about auction houses bidding practices.

  2. #112
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,439

    Re: Don Mattingly's disgrace

    Even Will Ferrell hates Don Mattingly, who can't stand to allow some good fun to continue in the name of charity.

    Poor Will doesn't know that Don's M.O., to pull a pitcher while he's having a perfect outing.

    http://m.dodgers.mlb.com/news/articl...for-la-dodgers

  3. #113
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,439

    Re: Don Mattingly's disgrace

    So here we are....another year, another early exit for the team with the largest payroll in MLB.

    Mattingly is once again on the "hot seat". And rightfully so. As most of you saw, the Dodgers, leading the Mets 2-1 with deGrom pretty much wobbling on the mat, made one of the most unforgivable mental blunders in the history of post season baseball. It was the 4th inning. Daniel Murphy singled in his at-bat, leaving him 2-for-2 in the game. So...on first with one out, Duda stepped into the box.

    Someone in the Dodger organization, presumably Mattingly, called for the now infamous "shift" with Duda batting. I say presumably because I can't imagine the guy has enough firing electrodes upstairs to come up with that on his own. But the stupidity of it would fit, so I'm not sure who was behind it. I'm assuming it was a team effort led by the little Sabermetrics clowns that Dodger brass bought into somewhere along the line. This group of number pushing idiots likely influenced the decision to adopt this great shift strategy (SMH). So over to shallow right field our third baseman Justin Turner went, in his designed position between A-Gone and Howie Kendrick. Corey Seager, our rookie shortstop called up just a month prior, slid over closer to second. Dead pull hitter set-up. Nice call Friedman, or Mattingly, or whoever!!

    Greinke was a bit too careful with Duda, a guy who during this series couldn't hit sand if he fell off a camel in the middle of the Sahara...and Greinke walked him.

    Rendering the shift a complete waste of time. Do you think the Sabermetrics geniuses crunched numbers on what happened next? The "shift", in all it's futility in practice, quickly became a more momentous play in the series than the "slide".

    As Murphy jogged to second, and Duda started his trot to first, the Dodgers went comatose, making absolutely no effort to get back to their normal positions while the Mets runners took their bases. Time out had not been called. The world watched as Murphy, a guy who had been killing the Dodgers physically the entire series, now showed them just how mentally unprepared skipper Mattingly had the "West Coast finest". He hit second in stride and sprinted on to an unmanned third base, easily setting himself up to NOW be scored on a simple fly ball.

    Which is of course, like a horror movie us Dodger fans keep having replayed for us over and over the past three seasons, exactly what happened. Mattingly's brain failures as manager led to the perfect presentation of "Murphy's Law".

    And that brings up a whole other can of stink. The next batter, d'Arnaud, hit a lazy fly ball down the right field line...in FOUL TERRITORY, yet deep enough to maybe score the run. Without as little as a glance at home plate, Andre Ethier ran over...and CAUGHT IT. In foul territory! The tying run scored, with no throw to home. Instead, the throw went to second to hold the runner on first. In catching that ball, the baseball world saw that the Dodgers had evidently been trained to TRADE an OUT for a RUN. Good, right? Err....maybe if you were leading by 4 or 5 runs!!!!

    In game 5 of a 5 game series, facing no tomorrow should they lose, consciously deciding to make a catch that scores a run while standing in foul territory....is an absolute disaster. If you guys are all going to jump at me with "Andre made that decision on his OWN. HOW is that MATTINGLY'S fault!??"

    Here's how...

    A month ago, I was attending a game between my Dodgers and the Angels at Anaheim Stadium. Chris Heisey, one of our young power-hitting outfielders who was called up a few times during the season and at roster expansion time, was playing left. It just so happens the exact same scenario played out that game. With one out, men on first and third, a fairly deep fly ball was hit down (this time) the left field line. Chris ran it down, but did a very smart thing. As he approached the ball, he realized it was deep enough to score a run. So he stepped aside and let it bounce in foul territory and into the stands. He consciously chose to not let that run score. As he turned to jog back to his position, he gestured with his hands back at the dugout in a manner of asking "Did I do the right thing? Is that what you guys want from me in a situation like that?" Obviously, he made that choice on his own. He wanted confirmation he did what was expected of his team. It was also obvious that that scenario hadn't been a topic discussed during work-outs or practice since Heisey was brought to L.A. HE had to make his own decision.

    The interesting part is not what happened next in the Angels game. The interesting part is that Mattingly and his coaching staff had been introduced to this exact type of play, at a time less serious, and gave them an opportunity to devise a team philosophy on how to handle that exact scenario should it ever arise again. Like...maybe at a critical time in the POSTSEASON!?

    And what do you know?

    Back at game 5, when Andre caught the ball, and threw it in to second, I noticed something that stuck in my mind. Something very telling. He jutted out his left hand in front of himself with his index finger and pinkie extended, signaling two outs. But he did so in a manner that made it seem like he himself disagreed with having to make that catch, so he emphasized the fact in disgust that yeah, we got two stupid outs now, but the score was tied! A great pitching duel, tight and for all the beans...and we just gave them a free run to tie the game?

    Andre should have never had to make his own decision, and apparently didn't based on his actions. If body language means anything, he acted on instruction, even though it ate at his very soul.

    I don't think Andre makes that catch unless he was instructed to. I think that had something to do with that well-televised rant at his manager in the dugout during the game. I'm not saying the rant was directly because of that play, but I do believe it added to Andre's frustration as to how the team is being managed. You can just SEE the players are done with him. Kershaw sure is. He has gotten into it with Don several times this season. When the players don't respect their own manager, you have a problem. When the players can see their chances of winning are being hurt....well, you have a disaster.

    The Dodgers had an opportunity to teach their players what to do in that exact scenario. If Andre lets that ball drop, apparently as they would have done in Cincinnati (Heisey came from the Reds), then the Dodgers would still have runners on first and third, and a shot at a double play, which would negate the run from scoring should they get it. In Cincinnati, they aren't giving anyone a free run, by God.

    More importantly, if the mental snafu doesn't happen on the shift, the fly ball is caught. If Murphy tags to third, no run has scored yet. The next batter, Conforto, grounded out to short. We gave them a run for nothing. And if Andre hadn't caught that foul fly ball, maybe we get the double-play ball to get out of the inning even AFTER the mental snafu.

    Isn't trying to keep the other team from tying the game, better than absolutely MAKING SURE they tie the game??

    But there are no efforts to win, no sense of urgency being shown by Mattingly in his managerial style. Just "Lefty vs. Righty" brainless sabermetrics managing, no matter who's calling the shots. Let's CHANGE the LINE-UP on a daily basis, sitting some of our hottest players in the process! Let's treat em ALL like a group of second stringers!! If I'm a manager for a big market team, and I'm being controlled by strings attached to my arms and legs by a Friedman-run GM group who thinks they know better on paper how to manage a live baseball team, then I have no self respect anyway. I should just move on and let this experiment crash short of a Championship as it has perpetually done in the past. Whichever way you cut the cake...Mattingly must go.

    These are the kinds of things that end seasons. The lack of BASIC preparedness and lack of leadership, the failure to plan and play out every scenario so your players know what to do when faced with every play possible on a baseball field!....rests souly on the shoulders of Don Mattingly the manager. These issues and how they are dealt with is what separates the good managers from the bad. The winners from the losers. Don Mattingly...is a loser. He doesn't possess the skills or ability to prepare a team to win, and certainly doesn't have the basic intelligence to manage a team of the Dodgers stature...a team that is EXPECTED to win.

    I'll go one step further. So now we're in the sixth. Still a 2-2 tie. Murphy is up with one out. This guy has been pounding the Dodgers the whole series. He already has an RBI double in the first, a single in the 4th, and both balls he hit off Greinke were scorched. Greinke isn't fooling him at ALL. He's owned the Dodgers to this point, already having hit two home runs off of Kershaw. So what does a good manager do in a tight game like this, facing this scenario? Continue to PITCH to him while sticking your head in the sand and hoping when you come up for air, everything will be smelling like roses??

    We all know how that worked out. 3-2, Mets.

    How about get up off your butt and yell out to your catcher, "HEY GRANDY!" When he looks over at you, you hold up four fingers and point to first! You TAKE the m'er f'ing BAT OUT OF HIS HANDS. At LEAST go talk to your pitcher, tell him "Everything low and outside, try to get him to chase. If you walk him, you WALK HIM, but this SON-OF-A-B&#@H is NOT GOING TO BEAT US." You show the team that your brain cells are firing, that you support them, that you are ON IT and want to WIN. You actually MAKE A MOVE to HELP THE TEAM. Then pitch the next two batters who you have been getting out all series long (save one home run by Cespedes off a lessor pitcher) in a manner to illicit a double play ball, or strike outs which is exactly what Greinke did again to both.

    But back in Donnie Baseball's reality, Murphy is now 3-for-3 and one triple away from a cycle, and your team is down 3-2. These kinds of snafu's, oversights, and missed opportunities to help the team win can escape scutiny during a 162 game season. But when you're in the play-offs....in a short 5-game series no less, there's nowhere to hide when you don't know what you're doing.

    It's time, Dodgers. Fire Mattingly. And while you're at it, take a good long look at your "GM" team. This Sabermetrics crap isn't all that. It's a TOOL, and should be considered, but to make it the whole basis of running a large market team??

  4. #114
    Senior Member slab0meat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    526

    Re: Don Mattingly's disgrace

    I was looking forward to this thread's revival.


  5. #115
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    226

    Re: Don Mattingly's disgrace

    suicide_squeeze; well written, nail on the head.

    +1

  6. #116
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,439

    Re: Don Mattingly's disgrace

    Quote Originally Posted by slab0meat View Post
    I was looking forward to this thread's revival.

    What's wrong meatslab...didn't find the "evidence" you were looking for this year?

    You never will. Mattingly should have been fired last year. But the Dodgers organization isn't made up from good baseball guys. It's made up from rich dudes who just want to be relevant, a couple of Sabermetrics geeks, and a basketball player for a front man. That's not exactly a recipe for success.

    So another year wasted. Let's see if the Dodgers finally get it. My guess...is not. I'm starting to think it's just a losing organization. Hope I'm wrong.

  7. #117
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,210

    Re: Don Mattingly's disgrace

    so Squeeze and Shaim are the same person?

  8. #118
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    715

    Re: Don Mattingly's disgrace

    The sac fly ball looked clearly fair, but started to drift significantly foul while Ethier was looking up. In this world where fans regularly interfere with balls near the stands, it seems some of the Dodger fans there could have helped Ethier out by yelling that it was drifting foul.

    I detest the shift, and would favor outlawing it. I hate to think baseball might go the way of football in the 60's, in which position names had to be revised, and revised again, before assuming generic names like 'wide receiver" and "running back" because players moved around too much for old terms like "halfback" to remain meaningful. But if you criticize one manager for using the shift, you'll need to criticize a bunch of them.

  9. #119
    Senior Member slab0meat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    526

    Re: Don Mattingly's disgrace

    Quote Originally Posted by suicide_squeeze View Post
    What's wrong meatslab...didn't find the "evidence" you were looking for this year?

    You never will. Mattingly should have been fired last year. But the Dodgers organization isn't made up from good baseball guys. It's made up from rich dudes who just want to be relevant, a couple of Sabermetrics geeks, and a basketball player for a front man. That's not exactly a recipe for success.

    So another year wasted. Let's see if the Dodgers finally get it. My guess...is not. I'm starting to think it's just a losing organization. Hope I'm wrong.
    I'm not looking for anything. I don't care. You care. The "evidence" mentioned previously was only in reference to the inevitable trial.


    Quote Originally Posted by earlywynnfan View Post
    so Squeeze and Shaim are the same person?
    Both coincidentally referred to me as "meatslab" ... hmmm? Both are ready to kill over the same "issues". You be the judge.

  10. #120
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,439

    Re: Don Mattingly's disgrace

    Quote Originally Posted by earlywynnfan View Post
    so Squeeze and Shaim are the same person?
    Not any more. I have made peace with the GUU clan.

    It's just me and my original name.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Skin By: PurevB.com