Hello & Welcome to our community. Is this your first visit? Register
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 46
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,547

    Re: PED's Baseball and Lance Armstrong

    Here's some Pete Rose evidence.
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  2. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    710

    Re: PED's Baseball and Lance Armstrong

    Quote Originally Posted by yanks12025 View Post
    Here's some Pete Rose evidence.
    Thanks, and here's some Jeter evidence for you too.
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  3. #23
    Senior Member gorilla777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,464

    Re: PED's Baseball and Lance Armstrong

    Quote Originally Posted by schubert1970 View Post
    George Brett - Age 38 .255 Age 39 .285 Age 40 .266

    Hank Aaron - Age 39 he had a great year, not a career year. Age 38, 40, 41 he batted .234 to .265

    Paul Molitor - He did have a career year at ages 37 and 39

    Mike Schmidt - Age 38 & 39 batted .242 and .203

    Pete Rose from age 39 to 45 Pete had one good year, not what I would call a carrer yer.

    Tony Gwynn - From age 38 - 41 had some great averages for his age, but not career years. Also, Tonly was on the doughnut diet.


    San Musial - Aside from batting .330 at age 41 he batted .255-.275 from ages 38-42
    Seems there is quite a bit omitted from this -

    Tony Gwynn:
    age 37 .372
    age 38 .321
    age 39 .338
    age 40 .323
    age 41 .324

    And fat as he was, that should be impossible at those ages.

    Paul Molitor:
    age 36 .332
    age 37 .341
    age 38 .270
    age 39 .341
    age 40 .305

    He was always injury prone, so suddenly playing the majority of games at a high level late in his career means you should question him too, correct?

    Pete Rose:
    age 37 .302
    age 38 .331
    age 39 average lower, had 64 RBIs
    age 40 .331

    I like Pete and not much to say about him that hasn't already been said.

    Hank Aaron:
    age 37 .327 47 HRs 118 RBIs
    age 38 .265 34 HRs 77 RBIs
    age 39 .301 40 HRs 96 RBIs

    His 162 gm avg is 37 and 113

    George Brett:
    age 37 .329 batting title

    career .305 hitter

    Mike Schmidt:
    age 36 MVP year, .290 37 HRs 119 RBIs
    age 37 .293 35 HRs 113 RBIs
    the last year and a half he was dealing with injuries

    Stan Musial:
    hit .330 at age 41
    averaged about .345 during ages 36 and 37
    His later numbers pale mostly because he put the bar so high.

    Warren Spahn:
    age 37 22-11 3.07 era
    age 38 21-15 2.96 era
    age 39 21-10 3.50 era
    age 40 21-13 3.02 era
    age 41 18-14 3.04 era
    age 42 23-7 2.60 era

    Maybe just a freak of nature, but purely amazing numbers

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,703

    Re: PED's Baseball and Lance Armstrong

    Quote Originally Posted by schubert1970 View Post
    Thanks, and here's some Jeter evidence for you too.
    Really?

    Comparing an 18-19 year old kid fresh out of high school to a 34 year old professional athlete with almost 2 decades worth of elite training, nutrition and conditioning is hardly a fair or accurate comparison of anything
    I collect Jay Bruce and Cincinnati Reds Minor League stuff


    My email address: hakes89@gmail.com

  5. #25
    Senior Member gorilla777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,464

    Re: PED's Baseball and Lance Armstrong

    It would probably be more on point to simply say that the Jeter comment was obviously unsubstantiated and flippant to put out there in the first place.

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,537

    Re: PED's Baseball and Lance Armstrong

    I'm definitely not ready to say I'm suspicios of Jeter. Guys stay in better shape in this era and Jeter loves the game enough to work at it. While I don't like the Yankees, I respect that.

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    710

    Re: PED's Baseball and Lance Armstrong

    Quote Originally Posted by chakes89 View Post
    Really?

    Comparing an 18-19 year old kid fresh out of high school to a 34 year old professional athlete with almost 2 decades worth of elite training, nutrition and conditioning is hardly a fair or accurate comparison of anything
    Where have we heard this before......

  8. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    710

    Re: PED's Baseball and Lance Armstrong

    Quote Originally Posted by gorilla777 View Post
    Seems there is quite a bit omitted from this -

    Tony Gwynn:
    age 37 .372
    age 38 .321
    age 39 .338
    age 40 .323
    age 41 .324

    And fat as he was, that should be impossible at those ages.

    Paul Molitor:
    age 36 .332
    age 37 .341
    age 38 .270
    age 39 .341
    age 40 .305

    He was always injury prone, so suddenly playing the majority of games at a high level late in his career means you should question him too, correct?

    Pete Rose:
    age 37 .302
    age 38 .331
    age 39 average lower, had 64 RBIs
    age 40 .331

    I like Pete and not much to say about him that hasn't already been said.

    Hank Aaron:
    age 37 .327 47 HRs 118 RBIs
    age 38 .265 34 HRs 77 RBIs
    age 39 .301 40 HRs 96 RBIs

    His 162 gm avg is 37 and 113

    George Brett:
    age 37 .329 batting title

    career .305 hitter

    Mike Schmidt:
    age 36 MVP year, .290 37 HRs 119 RBIs
    age 37 .293 35 HRs 113 RBIs
    the last year and a half he was dealing with injuries

    Stan Musial:
    hit .330 at age 41
    averaged about .345 during ages 36 and 37
    His later numbers pale mostly because he put the bar so high.

    Warren Spahn:
    age 37 22-11 3.07 era
    age 38 21-15 2.96 era
    age 39 21-10 3.50 era
    age 40 21-13 3.02 era
    age 41 18-14 3.04 era
    age 42 23-7 2.60 era

    Maybe just a freak of nature, but purely amazing numbers
    Funny thing, last I looked Jeter was 38 and those were the stats I looked at 38 and older. You picked younger years to fit your paradigm. But thanks for the informative info.

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,547

    Re: PED's Baseball and Lance Armstrong

    Quote Originally Posted by schubert1970 View Post
    Funny thing, last I looked Jeter was 38 and those were the stats I looked at 38 and older. You picked younger years to fit your paradigm. But thanks for the informative info.
    Then just look at the numbers from 38 and older and they have better years then some of the previous years.

  10. #30
    Senior Member gorilla777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,464

    Re: PED's Baseball and Lance Armstrong

    Quote Originally Posted by schubert1970 View Post
    Funny thing, last I looked Jeter was 38 and those were the stats I looked at 38 and older. You picked younger years to fit your paradigm. But thanks for the informative info.
    Yes, it was funny as i had mentioned looking at players stats covering late 30s and early 40s. And last time I looked, that would include ages 36, 37, etc. And my stats include many very good years above those ages as well.
    Nice job not including Spahn in your little paradigm...bravo!

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Skin By: PurevB.com