PDA

View Full Version : Jackets from eBay seller: cfljackson



danesei@yahoo.com
09-17-2014, 04:09 AM
I noticed this evening that all of the jackets sold over the last two weeks as game used by cfljackson came from the Summer 2014 Huggins & Scott auction. I have no problem with a seller making a profit by breaking up a lot, but the seller claimed the items were sourced from Jose Molina (Yankees jackets) and a Blue Jays clubhouse employee.

Apparently all three stories are just that, as here are the listings where they all originated from:

Blue Jays:
http://aug14.hugginsandscott.com/cgi-bin/showitem.pl?itemid=71421

Attributed to Vernon Wells: http://www.ebay.com/itm/171442607727
Attributed to Juan Guzman: http://www.ebay.com/itm/171442605190
Attributed to 1977: http://www.ebay.com/itm/171442599005
Attributed to 1977: http://www.ebay.com/itm/181513021146

All four of the items contradict the H&S listing.

Yankees:
http://aug14.hugginsandscott.com/cgi-bin/showitem.pl?itemid=71434

Listings claiming sourced from Jose Molina:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/181513014681
http://www.ebay.com/itm/181513015774
http://www.ebay.com/itm/171442578572

Listing claiming game used by El Duque in the 90s (Huggins & Scott identifies jacket as from the 2000s):

http://www.ebay.com/itm/181513013655

Just something to consider when bidding on items attributed to people without any real basis for attribution: If the seller's story contradicts a recent auction, it's likely just a story without any merit.

cjw
09-17-2014, 06:16 AM
Very interesting. Thanks for posting. I had noticed the Jays items on Ebay and had dismissed them as interesting but mostly retail and or minor league jackets (AIS and Goodman tagging).

cjw
09-17-2014, 06:25 AM
Taking a look at the Jays lot from the AH listing, all the Jays jackets while certainly a solid buy at $140 are each incorrectly attributed as game or team worn. At best these are minor league worn (AIS, Goodman) and retail examples (Irwin and those tagged L and XL etc).

The hats are pro style and were availabe via retailers as well as apparently (from the images shown) correct for team use.

The AH made some generalizations and assumptions in my opinion and the Ebay seller went on to fabricate stories of use and association IMHO.

cjw
09-17-2014, 06:27 AM
Very interesting. Thanks for posting. I had noticed the Jays items on Ebay and had dismissed them as interesting but mostly retail and or minor league jackets (AIS and Goodman tagging).

Mark17
10-01-2014, 01:31 AM
We've seen this guy before:

http://www.gameuseduniverse.com/vb_forum/showthread.php?t=60428&highlight=ron+hunt

For the record, I did get the 1970 Red Sox flannel I won from him for $393, but for awhile he was giving me the run-around, saying Fedex "misplaced" the package and they couldn't find it for a week, yet there was no tracking number, etc. But I was persistent, told him I wasn't buying that story, and the jersey arrived safe and sound.

danesei@yahoo.com
10-01-2014, 02:13 AM
I'm glad you had a good outcome from a bad situation. :)

captkoons
11-17-2014, 11:32 AM
Hey guys, I joined this forum after finding this thread. I've been onto cfljackson for years now, after noticing that every month or so he lists a "screen-used" prop pack of "Red Apple Cigarettes" that he claims were used in the film Pulp Fiction. He's sold dozens of these packs over the years, despite the fact that this brand of cigarettes only shows up about two or three times in the whole movie. He sells them for about $250 each using the same photos and description, even though his listing states "you are bidding on the exact pack depicted." He most recently sold a pack on September 30th, and then went on to list them two more times since then. This has been going on for years. His story is that he obtained them from the movie's production designer over 20 years ago, but with his seemingly endless supply of these props it's obvious that he is counterfeiting them. It makes me wonder what else he is counterfeiting. I've reported him to eBay several times and they don't seem to care. Does anyone here have any ideas on how someone like this could be prosecuted for obvious fraud?